|
An a priori proof contains a deeper understanding of nature.
Newton and Kepler were searching for an a priori explanation of orbits. They were keenly interested in determining the underlying reasons for the planetary laws.
The traditional approach to proving Kepler's Planetary Laws is not a priori since it relies on one of two premises. Either we assume that Newton's Inverse Square Law of Gravitational Force is true or we assume that Kepler's observation that orbits are ellipses is true. A proof can only be truly a priori if it does not rely on one of these premises.
Accordingly, in non a priori fashion, Newton demonstrated that if it is given that orbits are elliptical, then the force must vary inversely with the square of the distance. His demonstration, based on the empirical observation that orbits are elliptical, is the basis for the traditional, non a priori, explanation of orbits. In fact, most modern texts on celestial mechanics begin by using Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation as the premise for their proofs.
But there is a way to prove the planetary laws without relying on astronomical observations. The a priori proof presented in Orbits Explained begins with Newton's demonstration that equal areas are swept in equal times as a planet moves past the Sun, regardless of the relationship between distance and gravitational force. The a priori proof continues by employing a new mathematical device, the hododyne, to generate inverse proportions. Conveniently, the properties of tangential velocity and distance are inversely proportional to each other - as is easily demonstrated geometrically according to the concept of equal areas swept in equal times. By assigning these properties to the hododyne we can generate a diagram which exactly determines the position and velocity of the planet in a priori fashion. Many fundamental properties of planetary motion including the elliptical nature of orbits unfold as we study the hododyne and the orbits that it generates.
|
|